This type of knowledgeable, rigorous, deep analysis is so often missing from discussions of this topic, making it easy for people to be bamboozled by glib "experts" with fancy titles and big platforms who do nothing but preach dogma. Thank you, ML, for guiding us through the (actual) evidence.
This type of knowledgeable, rigorous, deep analysis is so often missing from discussions of this topic, making it easy for people to be bamboozled by glib "experts" with fancy titles and big platforms who do nothing but preach dogma. Thank you, ML, for guiding us through the (actual) evidence.
Excellent analysis!
It's bizarre that anyone would quote Chen et Al or Tordoff et Al to show the interventions "work."
An evidence-based critique? How has this research been received by the corresponding journals?
Bravo.